<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Kelly S Petrock - Change Facilitator, Team Builder, Leadership Coach</title>
		<link>http://www.kellypetrock.com/index.php</link>
		<description><![CDATA[No Footer]]></description>
		<copyright>Copyright 2012, Kelly S. Petrock</copyright>
		<managingEditor>Kelly S. Petrock</managingEditor>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<generator>SPHPBLOG 0.5.1</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Decoding Culture</title>
			<link>http://www.kellypetrock.com/index.php?entry=entry111012-020530</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<img src="images/NewnBest.JPG" width="175" height="217" border="0" alt="" /><br /><br /><b>Decoding Culture</b><br /><br />In recent post author and consultant Ron Ashkenas makes the following observation about how leaders fail to fully understand and deal with culture as focal point for change:<br /><br /><blockquote>The truth is that most leaders don&#039;t know how to develop a useful picture of their organization&#039;s culture, which is why they resort to platitudes. However when managers can better articulate the behavioral patterns that constitute the culture, they can determine which behaviors facilitate results — and which behaviors should be avoided.<br /></blockquote><br /><br />What Ron recommends is to engage leaders in dialogue based on simple questions.  Our Competing Values Culture Survey is a proven framework of questions that help leaders get to heart of what makes their culture tick or what&#039;s gumming up the works.  This simple tool allows leaders to explore and understand how their culture is impact performance and competitive advantage.  <br /><br /><a href="http://www.kellypetrock.com/contact.php" target="_blank" >Drop me a note</a> and I&#039;ll send you a link to this survey and share with you ways to get your leaders talking about, understanding and ultimately transforming the culture.<br /><br />If you&#039;d like to read the rest of Ron&#039;s post, here is the <a href="http://blogs.hbr.org/ashkenas/2011/10/why-you-should-question-your-c.html" target="_blank" >link</a>.  <br />]]></description>
			<category>Organizational Culture &amp; Climate</category>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.kellypetrock.com/index.php?entry=entry111012-020530</guid>
			<author>Kelly S. Petrock</author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 02:05:30 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://www.kellypetrock.com/comments.php?y=11&amp;m=10&amp;entry=entry111012-020530</comments>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Vision. </title>
			<link>http://www.kellypetrock.com/index.php?entry=entry110416-032253</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<img src="images/NewnBest.JPG" width="175" height="217" border="0" alt="" /><br /><br />Vision. If Seeing is believing, believing is...?<br /><br />As an element of successful change, a vision may be best defined by what it does rather than what it is.  Because what a vision needs to do is more important that what a vision needs to be / consist of, there should be a generous strike zone for what a vision includes; content, how many words it is, who it’s “for”, etc.  What is of real importance is what a vision must do; clarify, focus and galvanize intention.   <br /><br />Last week I helped kick off the 2011 Maryland World Class Consortia’s Lean Facilitator program- 19 new candidates from several member companies.  This program is a year long certification program (6 months for academic track) built upon the Shingo Prize criteria for Lean.  <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/pub/jeff-fuchs/6/122/855" target="_blank" >Jeff Fuchs</a> kicked off the program with an orientation for candidates and their “sponsors” and introduction to Lean principles, thinking and tools.  I followed Jeff and worked with the group for two days to strengthen their change leadership.  In this program we explored the relationships between vision, purpose and leadership.<br /><br />“Homework” between day 1 and day 2 of change leadership is on Visioning.  I used a simple “2012 press release” technique to help each participant develop a personal vision for themselves in their role as Lean Facilitator.   The press release is a vehicle to paint in a picture of success, of the desired future and to focus their intentions on that future.  Vision helps us prepare for the future, today.<br /><br />On the second day candidates came to the front of the room to share their press releases.  WOW!    Below is the press release / vision from Al Baity, a production manager with Atlas Container.  What would you like in a change agent?  Passion?  Perspective? Focus? Commitment? Connection to a greater good? Clarity of Purpose? Al and his fellow candidates delivered all that and more.   These presentations were the highlight of the program for me.  <br /><br /><blockquote>“On January 4, 2011 Atlas production was at a very low spot in manufacturing. They had tried many ways to cut cost while sales were staying stagnant. They would ask employees to volunteer to leave early to cut labor cost and avoid lay-offs. They tried to reduce waste. They took a strong action to improve quality. All of these actions did not increase sales nor did it add value to the bottom line. Things looked so bleak that lay-offs in all departments was the next step.<br />	<br />Tom Wood and Al Baity went to the owner and CEO Peter and Paul Centenari and asked could we give Lean manufacturing a chance. With very much doubt and uncertainty Peter and Paul agreed to give them a shot. <br />	<br />Tom, Al and David Austin signed up for a six month course to be Lean Facilitators. After each month session they returned to Atlas to implement some of the practices they have learned. They would ask employees what can we do to help you bring up set-up times and run speeds. That was the ball that started the game, asking 1 question.  By the end of each month they had several ideas and suggestions from employees. The next step was to put in a plan of action and let the employees implement the process. Not all employees were on board with the idea, such as employee Mac Dickens, “I just knew this was going to be a dumb Atlas idea. So to keep my job I went along with it. Suddenly I found out that things became easier. Tools and materials were always at my work area, I did less walking and was able to focus on the job at hand. I reduced my set-up times by 15 minutes and my run speeds went up to 1500 pcs an hour. This freed my time to focus on quality and waste.”<br />	<br />Waste at Atlas has reduced from 16% to 9%. Atlas has had a full year without a single quality complaint. Dale Holston Associate of Sales: “Due to the great quality I have increased my sales 20%, customers are asking how I can get my company involved in this Lean process?”<br />	<br />Paul Centenari: I did not want to trust Tom, Al and David. I knew I had a great group of dedicated workers. I did not think that I would have seen such a dramatic turn around in this process of Lean. The amazing thing is they are always doing more to better the practice of Lean. <br />	<br />Customer Dixon Valve, Mr. Hollinswood.  “I knew Atlas had potential but when I toured the company people were working and getting things done with little or no effort. That’s when I knew Atlas would be my only supplier.”<br /><br />Due to Lean efforts: Atlas has increased sales dollars from 3.5 million a month to 7 million, from 40 million square feet to 85 million and 150 orders a day to 325 orders a day. They added 4 new machines while maintaining the same labor force. There are leading efforts for 30 customers to become a Lean facility.<br /><br />Congratulations Atlas Container! Lean is working and manufacturing is changing in Maryland due to Atlas Container. “</blockquote><br /><br />Vision and visioning is common denominator in nearly every successful change endeavor.  Regardless of the change opportunity, we can help you, your team and your organization focus, clarify and galvanize intention with the power of vision.]]></description>
			<category>Organizational Change</category>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.kellypetrock.com/index.php?entry=entry110416-032253</guid>
			<author>Kelly S. Petrock</author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 03:22:53 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://www.kellypetrock.com/comments.php?y=11&amp;m=04&amp;entry=entry110416-032253</comments>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Team Based Management Guideline: Supervisor&#039;s Role</title>
			<link>http://www.kellypetrock.com/index.php?entry=entry110304-225447</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<img src="images/NewnBest.JPG" width="175" height="217" border="0" alt="" /><br /><br /><b>Team Based Management Guideline: Supervisor&#039;s Role</b><br />Becoming Team Based means committing to use high performance teams as the structure and process for work.  Becoming team based should be approached as a strategic level decision and a means toward competitive advantage / differentiation.  <br /> <br />Whenever our clients plan for becoming team based we encourage them to address the role of supervisors as fully as possible before any implementation.  Supervisors are critical to the ultimate maturation and performance of teams.  Here are a few key guidelines to consider.<br /><br /><b>1. It&#039;s important to think about the end game. </b> Supervisors quickly understand that more autonomous and independent high performance work teams will require less supervision i.e less supervisors.  Think about &quot;off-ramp&quot; roles like customer / supplier liaison, continuous improvement specialist, etc.  If possible, creatively attack this issue to the point that supervisors should not fear for their employment through this process.  <br /><br /><b>2. Involve supervisors in the design and planning process</b>.  Engage them directly and treat them like the key stakeholders that they are.  Be clear about the outcomes and functioning you desire from your teams.  Enroll supervisors in aligning the systems, guiding principles and team mechanics, roles, etc. to realize those team outcomes and levels of functioning.<br /><br /><b>3. Study the Supervisor Role</b>. To get any loft, teams will need a great deal of support and guidance from their supervisor, who has probably been renamed &quot;advisor&quot; or &quot;coach&quot; as part of the change.  We like to engage supervisors in a time study and reengineering of their role, activities and duties prior to any team implementation.  Over the course of two weeks, supervisors input data on their activities and time spent.  We feed this data back to the supervisors during a Role Redesign Workshop.  The goal of this workshop is to develop solutions that sweep the their role free of much of the cumbersome and unproductive activities that supervisors seem to be magnets for. This workshop helps prepare supervisors for the change as well as freeing them up to actually support their teams.<br /><br /><b>4. Nontraditional Development.</b>  Supervisors will need training to navigate their team leadership; team dynamics, developing a participative approach, conflict resolution, meeting facilitation, etc.  Also look toward less traditional development activities such as regular round tables, peer coaching, lunch and learns, etc.  These activities not only give supervisors a voice but keep them engaged as a community in the success of teams.<br /><br />Becoming team based is a serious undertaking and should require some intensive planning and spot on change management.  Of all the things to &quot;get right&quot;, doing right by the supervisors and treating them like tier one stakeholders will pay dividends down the road.  <br /><br />Please share you wisdom on how to prepare and engage supervisors in the use of high performance teams.<br /><br />]]></description>
			<category>Teams, Teambuilding &amp; Team Based Management</category>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.kellypetrock.com/index.php?entry=entry110304-225447</guid>
			<author>Kelly S. Petrock</author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 22:54:47 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://www.kellypetrock.com/comments.php?y=11&amp;m=03&amp;entry=entry110304-225447</comments>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>High Performance Work Climate: A Six-Pack of Practices</title>
			<link>http://www.kellypetrock.com/index.php?entry=entry101124-214135</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<img src="images/NewnBest.JPG" width="175" height="217" border="0" alt="" /><br /><br /><b>High Performance Climate Six Pack: </b><br />In our research and work with High Performance Work Climates we have found a “hit list of six” essential practices that contributed the most to producing positive work climates. The implication of this hit list of six is that a healthy, satisfying, high-performing climate results when managers do at least the following six well: <br /><br />  1.  Clarify people’s roles and responsibilities.                    <br />  2.  Set challenging performance goals and standards.<br />  3.  Demonstrate personal commitment to the organization’s goals.    <br />  4.  Encourage innovation and risk taking.<br />  5.  Conduct team meetings in a way that builds mutual trust.<br />  6.  Encourage people to participate in decisions<br /><br />What does this mean?  First, these six practices describe a leadership approach that is high involvement, high trust, challenging and committed.  This also means that when employees scored their managers as doing well in at least these six practices, you could predict that the overall climate in the work unit would be more positive.  Next, it means that ensuring managers are doing these things has a high impact on motivation, performance and satisfaction.   <br /><br />Finally, for those of you who attended our LEAD Program for High Potential Managers (www.leadinstitute.com), these six practices correspond to the Clan Culture: Items -15 &amp; 18, Adhocracy Culture: Item 9, Enterprise Culture: Items 4 &amp; 5 and Hierarchy Culture: Item 2.<br /><br /><b>Caution — </b>Style Is Important:  Please keep in mind that how a manager goes about doing these six practices and the other twelve is equally important. In our LEAD Institute Program we help managers see that good leadership is a function of both substance (what you do) and style (how you do it).  Managers can do the 18 leadership factors above and still create a negative climate because of the manner in the way they interacted with others.<br /><br /><b>Survey Guided Development: </b>The objective of changing the climate or culture is to make your organization or work unit more productive and a better place in which to work.  Contact us if you would like to learn more about how we use Organizational Climate/Culture Survey assessments to guide and drive both organizational transformation, leadership development and performance improvement.<br /><br /><br />** Source: Robert Stringer, Leadership &amp; Organizational Climate, Prentice Hall, 2002.<br />]]></description>
			<category>Organizational Culture &amp; Climate</category>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.kellypetrock.com/index.php?entry=entry101124-214135</guid>
			<author>Kelly S. Petrock</author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2010 21:41:35 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://www.kellypetrock.com/comments.php?y=10&amp;m=11&amp;entry=entry101124-214135</comments>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Levers for Change</title>
			<link>http://www.kellypetrock.com/index.php?entry=entry100714-132926</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<img src="images/Meworking.jpg" width="150" height="193" border="0" alt="" /><br /><br /><b>Levers For Change</b><br /><br />Years ago I read a book entitle &quot;Strategies that Work&quot;.  It&#039;s a great book that broke the strategic planning process down quite well with many practical steps for strategy formulation and deployment.  <br /><br />What has stuck with me for all these years was the list of &quot;Influence Systems&quot; that were laid out in the book.  Through these influence systems the author made an effective case for the simple truth that in order for there to be change, things must actually change.  <br /><br />Below are these these influence systems or as I have come to call them, Levers For Change.  A lever is a simple tool that helps perform difficult work more easily.  For a lever to function it requires a fulcrum.  One of the items below is the fulcrum, where it&#039;s positioned in the process for change makes all the difference in the leverage.<br />•   Goals, Measures, Feedback &amp; Performance Systems.<br />•   Rewards, Awards, Recognition &amp; Incentive Systems.<br />•   Communication Systems.<br />•   Competency Development, Training &amp; Learning Systems.<br />•   Organizational Structure.<br />•   Senior Leadership (Behaviors).<br />•   Rules, Policies, Protocols &amp; Governance Systems.<br />•   Physical Environment &amp; Layout.<br />•   Key Programs &amp; Initiatives (LeanSigma, etc.)<br />•   Staffing, Selection &amp; Talent Development.<br />•   Information &amp; Knowledge Management Systems.<br />•   Ceremonies &amp; Events.<br /><br />To realize strategies or any other change, there must be substantive changes made.  The list above represents key areas where substantive changes may need to occur.  <br /><br />Our technique for culture change initiatives and strategic change initiatives is to use a &quot;from... to...&quot; analysis.  This is a simple process where the client characterizes and describes the attributes / functionality of the influence system as it is today and re-characterizes  the influence system in a way that better supports the desired change, state or strategy.  This &quot;from... to...&quot; work provides a useful gap analysis and allows for powerful objectives, projects and initiatives for change to emerge and be clarified.<br /><br />Senior leadership, by the way, is the fulcrum and having them &quot;close to the work&quot; adds significant leverage to any change.<br /><br />In later blogs I&#039;ll expand upon these levers, describe them more fully and outline many of the different types (versatility) of work these levers can perform.]]></description>
			<category>Organizational Culture &amp; Climate</category>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.kellypetrock.com/index.php?entry=entry100714-132926</guid>
			<author>Kelly S. Petrock</author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 13:29:26 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://www.kellypetrock.com/comments.php?y=10&amp;m=07&amp;entry=entry100714-132926</comments>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Leadership &amp; Courage</title>
			<link>http://www.kellypetrock.com/index.php?entry=entry100402-131247</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<img src="images/NewnBest.JPG" width="175" height="217" border="0" alt="" /><br /><br /><b>Leadership &amp; Courage</b><br /><br />Leading in times of certainty and little ambiguity requires courage, but of the ordinary kind.<br /><br />Leading in times of ambiguity and uncertainty requires a special measure of courage.<br /><br />Creating an environment (being open and receptive) to where folks feel safe to surface their concerns and uncertainties requires a courage above the other two.  <br /><br />How will you Lead with courage today?]]></description>
			<category>Leadership</category>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.kellypetrock.com/index.php?entry=entry100402-131247</guid>
			<author>Kelly S. Petrock</author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 13:12:47 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://www.kellypetrock.com/comments.php?y=10&amp;m=04&amp;entry=entry100402-131247</comments>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Culture Kaizen: Unique Approach to Culture Transformation</title>
			<link>http://www.kellypetrock.com/index.php?entry=entry100317-043050</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<img src="images/NewnBest.JPG" width="175" height="217" border="0" alt="" /><br /><br /><b>Culture Kaizen: Unique Approach to Culture Transformation</b><br /><br /><b>Overview.</b> A quick look in the rearview mirror at the last 18 months has left many leaders with sweaty palms on the steering wheel, a rapid pulse and a strong sense of “I don’t want go through that again!”. For those that have survived or are still &quot;white-knucklng-it&quot; through tough terrain the challenge is now to transform significantly enough to conduct business in a new and more sustainable way. The next 18-36 months will present leaders with a unique inflection point for change and transformation. The LEAD Culture Kaizen is great way to start, course correct and or accelerate the transformational journey. <br /><br />Kaizen, often associated with Lean, is a proven methodology to scrutinize and continuously improve business and technical systems. Our unique approach applies all the power and principles of Kaizen to scrutinize and transform the human system, the culture of the organization or work unit.  <br /><br />Kaizen relies heavily on simple and effective tools such as value stream maps, process flows, Seven-forms of waste, Five-S’s, time-value maps, etc. These tools are used to engage people in often non-intuitive concepts and to help them clearly &quot;see&quot; significant improvement opportunities in their technical systems and processes. During the LEAD Culture Kaizen we use simple and proven tools to help leaders and members &quot;see&quot; and grasp the often non-intuitive and unspoken culture change opportunities that can be the “make-it” or “break-it” factors for sustainable performance and transformation.<br /><br />Organizational culture affects ALL business transformation initiatives (not just Lean) and efforts at three critical phases; implementation phase, adoption phase and sustainability phase. The LEAD Culture Kaizen is a powerful catalyst for change at any of these phases.<br /><br /><img src="images/Puzzle.002.jpg" width="500" height="375" border="0" alt="" /><br /><br />For more information on this powerful and unique approach to transformational change please click <a href="http://www.leadinstitute.com/gscg/workshops/kaizen.php" target="_blank" >here</a><br />]]></description>
			<category>Organizational Culture &amp; Climate</category>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.kellypetrock.com/index.php?entry=entry100317-043050</guid>
			<author>Kelly S. Petrock</author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 04:30:50 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://www.kellypetrock.com/comments.php?y=10&amp;m=03&amp;entry=entry100317-043050</comments>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><b>Creativity and Innovation Impact Session: Client Highlight</b></title>
			<link>http://www.kellypetrock.com/index.php?entry=entry100215-021600</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<img src="images/NewnBest.JPG" width="175" height="217" border="0" alt="" /><br /><br /><b>Creativity and Innovation Impact Session: Client Highlight</b><br /><br />Last week we had the opportunity to collaborate with a client to design and facilitate a well received Impact session on Creativity &amp; Innovation.  For this process we partnered with long time friend and consulting associate <a href="http://www.zeislerassociates.com/index.html" target="_blank" >Steve Zeisler</a>.  <br /><br />The session was comprised of about 25 carefully selected &quot;Innovators&quot; (think six sigma black belts with an entrepreneurial twist) and senior &quot;change leaders&quot; from throughout the organization.  <br /><br />The highlights of this process and engagement were:<br />1. <b>An overview of creativity and innovation.</b><br />2. Sharing and interpreting results from the <b>Creative Styles Inventory</b>.<br />3. A review and practicum of <b>tools for innovation and creativity</b>.<br />4. Sharing and interpreting results of <b>Organizational Climate for Innovation</b> Survey.<br />5. Innovation project selection, team formation and chartering.<br /> <br /><br /><b>1. An Overview of creativity and innovation. </b> Most organizations today can&#039;t leave innovation to chance.  The &quot;kids in the garage&quot; are out there, they have more channels to market than ever and they want your business. Together this group of innovators and senior leaders explored the explosive rate of change that is occurring around them and its implications to their business.  <br /><br /><b>2. Creative Styles Inventory (CSI)</b>. We are all creative, but <i>how</i> we are creative can differ in some significant ways.  Edison was certainly creative in his way, just as Einstein was creative in his own way.  Neither was more creative than the other, but they were certainly different in how they were creative.  Edison&#039;s creative preference called for a more structured approach and Einstiens&#039;s a preference for less structure.  Both preferences are &quot;good&quot; and valid, but their process and preference for creativity is on opposite ends of a continuum.  <br /><br />For those whose roles require creative output, or who must lead teams and organizations wherein creativity must flourish, it is important to understand the human dimensions of creativity.  The CSI helps us appreciate the continuum of human creative preferences and can help us approach creative challenges without personal bias and increased team effectiveness.  Within the session participants received their CSI results and explored its implications to them as innovators and as change leaders.<br /><br /><b>3. Tools for Innovation and Creativity.</b>  Just as there is a continuum of human preferences for creativity, the tools we use for creativity can also be placed on a continuum from high to low structure.  During the session participants were exposed to a continuum of tools. There are over twenty such tools and brainstorming is in the middle of the continuum.  In addition to some tool practice, a take-away for the group was that for every creative challenge there is a &quot;better&quot; fit tool.  <br /><br /><b>4. Organizational Climate for Innovation</b>. Organizations that must innovate have to understand that the richness, volume and impact of their efforts will rise or fall on the degree to which the organization posses a healthy Climate for Innovation.  There are nine <b>(9)</b> clear and measurable dimensions that differentiate Innovative organizations from those that are stagnate.  During the session the group reviewed the results from the Climate for Innovation assessment we conducted prior to the Impact Session. Input was provided to develop strategies to strengthen the climate.<br /><br />A take away for the group was that if we want innovative results, the process starts with nurturing a climate that stimulates contributors to think expansively, give their best insights and ideas.  If winning in the market place is a war of innovation, Climate is a key force multiplier and key differentiator. <br /><br /><b>5. Innovative Project Selection, Team Formation and Chartering</b>.  With the benefit of all previous session elements and discussions, the group worked together to select high leverage innovation projects and begin team formation.<br /><br /><img src="images/InnovationGraphic.007.jpg" width="500" height="375" border="0" alt="" /><br /><br />The graphic above captures additional considerations this Impact Session addressed.  Effective innovation requires an integrated process, an innovative climate and the application of a wide array of tools/approaches.  A key set of in-process (lead) metrics and key set of output performance metrics must also be developed to aim the innovation process in line with business needs. <br /><br />I welcome your comments and questions.  Please contact me if your organization, work unit or team would benefit from an Impact Session like this or any aspect of the process that has been highlighted in this blog.  If your strategic need is not Innovation &amp; Creativity, we can work with you to develop a change approach and Impact Session tailored to your needs.]]></description>
			<category>Organizational Culture &amp; Climate</category>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.kellypetrock.com/index.php?entry=entry100215-021600</guid>
			<author>Kelly S. Petrock</author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 02:16:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://www.kellypetrock.com/comments.php?y=10&amp;m=02&amp;entry=entry100215-021600</comments>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Culture Change via Team Based Management: Client Case Highlight</title>
			<link>http://www.kellypetrock.com/index.php?entry=entry100122-020743</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<img src="images/NewnBest.JPG" width="175" height="217" border="0" alt="" /><br /><br /><b>Culture Change via Team Based Management: Client Case Highlight</b><br /><br />Just last month I spent a week with a client I’ve been consulting with for about three years now. Typical of many of our clients and most organizations, they are wrestling with a few key issues:<br /><br />• How to hold people accountable, ensure that employees are all “pulling their share”.?<br />• How to run effective and productive meetings?<br />• How to define and address poor performance?<br />• How to function as a high performance team?<br />• How to confront disruptive behaviors?<br />• How to select and hire the best people?<br />• How to make performance appraisals meaningful?<br />• How to stabilize processes and increase performance?<br /><br />What is rather atypical and not like many organizations is WHO within this client is wrestling with the above sticky issues.  You see, the folks who are tackling and managing the issues in this case are the hourly production workers.  <a href="http://www.leadinstitute.com/gscg/dls/ClientHighlight-TBM.pdf" target="_blank" >Read More</a>]]></description>
			<category>Organizational Culture &amp; Climate</category>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.kellypetrock.com/index.php?entry=entry100122-020743</guid>
			<author>Kelly S. Petrock</author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 02:07:43 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://www.kellypetrock.com/comments.php?y=10&amp;m=01&amp;entry=entry100122-020743</comments>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><b>Using Appreciative Inquiry for Strategic Change: Client Case Highlight</b>.</title>
			<link>http://www.kellypetrock.com/index.php?entry=entry100108-020521</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<img src="images/Meworking.jpg" width="150" height="193" border="0" alt="" /><br /><br /><b>Client Case &amp; Highlight</b><br />Recently we had an opportunity to build a planned change consulting project for one of our clients.   The impetus for this project was a major change in organizational structure accompanied by a high level leadership transition.  It’s important to capitalize upon the windows for change these opportunities present. <br /><br />The incoming leader astutely wanted to avoid the common “ash n trash” trap incoming leaders can fall into.  “Ash n trash” is when the new leader focuses on finding fault with, criticizing and attending to the weaknesses of their new organization in an effort to build a case for change.  The kind of burning platform that hurts.  Focusing on weaknesses, problems and gaps has a way leading to people feeling exposed, dumb and defensive.  Not a great way to build bridges toward a successful future.  <br /><br />Given the overall situation and the requirement for this process to be a more positive and building process, we developed an approach to strategic change using an <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appreciative_inquiry" target="_blank" >Appreciative Inquiry</a> approach to transformation.  This approach is based on positive psychology, no CRITICISMS, no PROBLEMS, no GAPs, it&#039;s a process of finding your strategic organizational strengths and amplifying them.  This is a great approach for helping new leaders learn about as well as set a positive tone for transforming their new organization.<br /><br />The other really nice thing about an approach based on AI (click on the link above to better appreciate this) is that the process is viral, negating many of the difficult and typical failure modes and forms of resistance inherent in traditional approaches to change.  <br /><br />One of the opportunities that emerged for the client from this process was a focus on Creativity &amp; Innovation, a strategic capability that they had possessed, had lost touch with and committed to amplify.  I’ll use the specific focus area of Creativity and Innovation to help make the process overview described below a little more concrete.  <br /><br />Below is a summary of some of the key steps and elements from this process. Phase I, II and III are most closely associated with AI and how we &quot;got there&quot;. Phase IV and V are the phases that pertain to specific project implementations including increased Creativity &amp; Innovation throughout the enterprise.  <br /><br /><b>Phase 1. Finding the Strategic Leverage</b>.  Senior leaders were actively engaged in this phase and conducted carefully structured Appreciative Inquiry interviews with their staff, customers and other key stakeholders.  From this initial work the senior leaders identified four strategic capabilities to address, one of which was Creativity &amp; Innovation.<br /><br /><b>Phase II. Tapping into Passion &amp; Possibilities.</b>  This is the viral part of the process. The staff who were interviewed by senior leaders (as well as others, about 25-30 people) then received some brief training and went on to conduct a handful (5) of structured interviews themselves.  We created a database to capture and compile the contents of the interviews to make it easy to extract intelligence.  Effective and consistently constructed interviews are the key here.  The client created a “portal”, a virtual space where all interviews could be shared and read by every employee in the organization.  This second round of interviews took place over the course of a month.  I can’t stress how powerful these client driven interviews are, how they raise awareness and start to shift thinking.   <br /><br /><b>Phase III. Summit.</b>  All interviewers, interviewees and other key stakeholders (150+ people) came together in an interactive summit.  At the summit the interviews were shared and dissected in an effort to learn from and apply their collective wisdom for change.  Key areas for change were identified and Strategic Deployment Teams were chartered and launched.  One of these teams was focused on Creativity &amp; Innovation.<br /><br /><b>Phase IV. Impact Session(s). </b> Strategic Deployment Teams go through a JumpStart launch process to accelerate their impact.  Each Impact session is constructed of three elements- Concepts Lab in their area of strategic deployment (i.e. creativity and innovation), Opportunity / Strategy definition and Goal Setting , Project Selection, Scope &amp; Chartering.  The creativity and innovation Impact Session is designed to bring about change through an integrated set of strategies.  These strategies are organized in the following &quot;buckets&quot;;<br />• Climate &amp; Leadership for Innovation. <br />• Technology &amp; Enabling Systems<br />• Education &amp; Awareness<br />• Application and deployment of tools &amp; capabilities.<br /><br /><b>Phase IV. Hoshin / Catch-ball Project Deployment</b>.  Hoshin / catch-ball principles are used to align and manage the execution and impact of projects.  The cycle time for this overall effort, including verification of results in one year.<br /><br />I welcome your comments,  insights and experiences about change and transformation. If you would like more information on how to design an approach for your organization or team, please push the Contact Me button.<br />]]></description>
			<category>Client Highlights</category>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.kellypetrock.com/index.php?entry=entry100108-020521</guid>
			<author>Kelly S. Petrock</author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 02:05:21 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://www.kellypetrock.com/comments.php?y=10&amp;m=01&amp;entry=entry100108-020521</comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

